Israel’s Plan To Use The U.S. Military Against It’s Own People – The American People.

Today is Day 30 of Trumps Iran War For Israel.

Trump’s “Animals” Rhetoric Fuels Muslim Stereotyping Claims, Fearmongering and Stereotyping: Trump’s October 7 Israel attacks that the IDF allowed to happen, Just Like the September 11th 2001 Attacks the FBI and CIA allowed to happen, Because MOSSAD made them.

🚨 BREAKING:

Israeli soldier tells CNN the IDF is helping Israeli settlers expand illegal settlements in the West Bank.

CNN Reporter: “This isn’t a legal settlement.”

IDF soldier: “It will be.”

He then proceeded to assault the reporter. pic.twitter.com/vB43vURoPF

— America 24 News (@America24news_) March 30, 2026

Jan 2026 – March 2026 = The Trump Admin Is Gutting TSA To Replace Them With ICE Agents + Armed Reserve Military Troops To Enforce Patriot Act Against Fake News “Muslim Terrorists” Attacks “Coming” – Israel False Flags (9/11 Again)

Critics have frequently accused Donald Trump of fearmongering in his rhetoric surrounding the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel, particularly when he labels the perpetrators as “animals,” “terrorists,” or “horrible people” and describes graphic atrocities such as babies being “chopped in half,” arms and heads cut off, or families burned alive. Opponents, including media outlets and political figures, argue that these vivid, repeated descriptions — often tied to warnings about Iran-backed groups, unchecked migration allowing terrorists into the U.S., or the dangers of weakness inviting more violence — exaggerate threats, stoke public anxiety, and serve to justify aggressive policies like mass deportations, border security crackdowns, or strong military support for Israel. They claim such language dehumanizes broader Palestinian or Muslim populations and recycles unverified or partially debunked early reports about specific horrors (like widespread beheadings of infants) to paint an apocalyptic picture of existential danger to Western civilization

UPDATE: As of Day 30 There are now 50,000 U.S. Troops near Iran building up for a large invasion possibly on April 3rd 2026.

Israel's Plan To Use The U.S. Military Against It's Own People – The American People.

LIVE TV News 24-7📰: https://t.co/Jm6IuHWa9G

Watch on Amazon Silk, TV Browser, Mobile Phone, Tablet, Mac, or Desktop PC

America24News ❤️🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/zE4F4gdyrm

— America 24 News (@America24news_) March 29, 2026

The USA PATRIOT Act, officially known as the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, was a landmark piece of legislation passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush just 45 days after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Enacted in an atmosphere of national fear and urgency, the Act dramatically expanded the federal government’s surveillance and investigative powers to combat terrorism.

Key provisions included enhanced authority for wiretapping, access to business records, and the ability to conduct “sneak and peek” searches without immediate notification to the target. It also lowered the barriers between criminal investigations and intelligence gathering, allowing greater information sharing among federal agencies like the FBI, CIA, and NSA. Supporters argued that these measures were essential to prevent future attacks by breaking down bureaucratic silos and modernizing law enforcement tools in the digital age.

View: The Patriot Act Official Congress Bill

View: The Justice Department Official Document

America 24 News Back Up Cloud Copy: (Justice Department Official DOJ Document)

The Patriot Act Is Not For Patriots: It’s For Zombies, Who Will Let Israel Take Over America, Zionism, In The Name of “Safety and Freedom” and “Fighting Terrorism”

The real terrorists are in Israel, who send U.S.A troops to fight their wars half way around the world, for oil and other shit. Because Jews have a Huge Islamophobia problem.

How Will Israel Do This?

By Degrading other countries, name calling, chaos, Forever wars, and no peace. Israel thrives on Chaos. It’s an excuse for more money and to kill “terrorists” and expand their borders and steal other middle east countries oil.

Trump calling people “animals”

One of the most famous and widely discussed instances of President Trump using the term “animals” occurred in May 2018 during a White House roundtable meeting on immigration and MS-13 gang violence. In response to reports of brutal crimes by the gang, Trump stated, “These aren’t people. These are animals,” and “When the MS-13 comes in, when the other gang members come into our country, I refer to them as animals.” He repeatedly defended the language in subsequent remarks, emphasizing that it applied specifically to violent MS-13 members and other criminal gang elements crossing the border illegally, not to immigrants in general. Trump continued using the phrase in speeches and rallies, including during his 2024 campaign, where he warned of “illegal alien rapists, MS-13 animals, and child predators” entering communities.

In later years, including references into 2024–2025, Trump invoked the term consistently in the context of transnational gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua, as well as other violent criminals. He described them as “animals” responsible for horrific acts such as knifing victims and allowing them to die slowly. Supporters viewed the rhetoric as blunt truth-telling about dangerous offenders, while critics accused it of dehumanizing broader immigrant populations. Trump maintained the distinction, repeating in interviews and events that law-abiding people are not the target and that he would “always” use the term for such threats.

Trump calling people “horrible people

“President Trump has used the phrase “horrible people” across various contexts, often targeting political opponents, accusers, or protesters. In October 2016, amid sexual assault allegations during the campaign, he lashed out at his accusers, declaring, “These people are horrible people. They’re horrible, horrible liars,” and tying the claims to political timing against Clinton. He applied similar language to Democratic figures, such as calling Adam Schiff a “vicious horrible person” and Nancy Pelosi “a horrible person” during 2020 impeachment-related remarks. In 2020 meetings on law enforcement, he referred to “radical anarchists” and agitators during protests as “horrible people” who were not true protesters.

More recently, in December 2025 while hosting the Kennedy Center Honors, Trump directly addressed parts of the audience as “miserable, horrible people,” contrasting them with supporters he knew personally. The comment came during remarks on persistence and loyalty, highlighting perceived opposition in the crowd. Across these uses, the phrase served as a sharp personal or political rebuke rather than a blanket label for any specific group, appearing in rallies, interviews, and official settings to characterize perceived dishonesty, viciousness, or disruption.

Trump calling people “terrorists”

Trump has frequently labeled certain individuals and groups as “terrorists,” particularly in immigration and domestic security contexts. During his second term, he issued executive actions in 2025 designating Antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization,” describing it as a “militarist, anarchist enterprise” engaged in violence, riots, and efforts to overthrow government authority. He had called for this since 2020 amid protests, framing Antifa-linked actions as domestic terrorism rather than protected protest. On the border, Trump repeatedly stated that policies under previous administrations allowed “terrorists,” criminals, and gang members to “pour into our country,” citing thousands of encounters with watchlist individuals.

In speeches and 2024–2026 addresses, he linked the term to transnational threats like drug cartels (designated as foreign terrorist organizations alongside MS-13 and Tren de Aragua) and pro-Hamas activists or students involved in campus unrest. Trump described these as “terrorist thugs” smuggling drugs or inciting violence, and referenced specific incidents, such as post-October 7, 2023, actions or 2025 protests, as justification for heightened enforcement and deportations. The rhetoric underscored his view of organized political violence and unchecked migration as national security threats.

Trump calling people “cutting baby heads”

rump on Hamas perpetrators as “animals” in the context of October 7President Trump has repeatedly described the Hamas militants responsible for the October 7, 2023 attacks as vicious animals and barbarians who committed unimaginable cruelty. In various statements and through his administration’s officials, he and allies framed Hamas as “vicious animals” who carried out horrifying crimes, including the massacre at the Nova music festival and kibbutzim. Trump emphasized that such actors are not ordinary people but savage threats that must be confronted forcefully, echoing his long-standing rhetoric against terrorists and gangs. He warned that weakness invites such barbarism and stated that the attacks represented “chilling savagery” that struck at the core of humanity.

In 2024–2025 remarks, including at October 7 remembrance events and UN addresses, Trump continued to invoke strong language against Hamas, aligning with descriptions of them as “barbarians” and “animals” who unleashed “the gates of hell.” He argued that the group’s actions proved they could not be negotiated with in the same way as civilized actors and must be dismantled. Supporters saw this as truthful condemnation of pure evil, while critics viewed it as dehumanizing rhetoric. Trump maintained that remembering the animalistic brutality of October 7 is essential to preventing future attacks and ensuring strong leadership deters such threats.

He extended similar language to Iranian leadership and proxies, calling them “bad people” and “horrible people” in the context of the killing and terror seen on and after October 7. Trump argued that these actors had engaged in decades of violence, making the attacks a continuation of their “horrible” record. In UN remarks and interviews, he stressed that rewarding such behavior with statehood or concessions would only encourage more horror, positioning his approach as one that confronts rather than appeases “horrible” terrorist elements.

America’s 9th Middle East War Lost With Trump: A Wake-Up Call We Can’t Ignore.. Americans….

8 U.S.A Presidents Who Bombed the Middle East and all lost.

2026: The Phrase of the Year, “Poverty Is Ignorance” After Trumps Iran Bombings, War Crimes, Genocide, For Israel.

Japan Can Only Use Its Military in Self-Defense vs Zionist American Presidents Who Always Attack First (Middle East) For Israel

Trump has consistently labeled Hamas as terrorists and the October 7 attack as one of the worst terrorist atrocities in modern history, comparing it to 9/11 and the Holocaust in scale of evil against Jews. He described the group as a “terrorist organization” that must be dealt with decisively, stating that the horrors “would never have happened” under his leadership due to strength and deterrence. In multiple 2024–2025 addresses, Trump called for maximum pressure on Hamas, including military action if needed, to free hostages and prevent the group from remaining in Gaza.

He repeatedly invoked “remember October 7” as a rallying cry against treating Hamas as anything other than terrorists, warning that unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state would reward “Hamas terrorists for their atrocities.” Trump framed the attack as pure terrorism involving mass murder, hostage-taking, and systematic brutality, and pledged to confront not just Hamas but its sponsors. His rhetoric underscored that terrorists like those behind October 7 understand only strength, not weakness or negotiation that leaves them intact.

Trump on graphic violence including “cutting baby heads” during October 7Trump has used highly graphic language to describe the atrocities committed during the Hamas October 7 attacks, stating that it amounted to “genocide at the highest level” involving “little babies were chopped in half,” arms cut off, and “heads were cut off people.” In a direct response to questions about related claims, he affirmed these acts as undeniable murder and barbarism, emphasizing the savagery that included burning people alive and massacring families. He referenced such horrors in remembrance events and interviews to underscore the evil of the day.

Trump has characterized the October 7 Hamas attacks as part of actions by “horrible” actors and groups, often linking them to broader networks like Iran-backed terrorists. He described the assault as one of the “darkest days in all history” and a “moment in horrible history,” highlighting the evil unleashed by those responsible. In speeches marking the anniversary and in policy addresses, he referred to the perpetrators and their enablers as contributing to “horrible atrocities,” including the massacre that killed over 1,200 people and took hundreds hostage. Trump tied this to his criticism of perceived weakness that allowed such “horrible” events to occur.

In U.S.A with Democrats:

Trump has not been directly quoted using the exact phrase “cutting baby heads,” but he has employed highly graphic language accusing Democrats of supporting “executing babies” or infanticide after birth. In multiple 2024 campaign events, rallies, and the September 2024 presidential debate, he claimed that some Democratic-led states and figures like former Virginia Governor Ralph Northam supported scenarios where “the baby is born and we will decide what to do with the baby—in other words, we’ll execute the baby.” He tied this to opposition against a federal born-alive bill and described it as radical policy allowing “killing the baby after it’s born.” Fact-checks consistently note that no state permits legal execution of born infants, as it constitutes homicide.

This rhetoric dates back to at least 2019 and remained a staple through 2024–2025 speeches, where Trump contrasted it with his own pro-life stance and accused opponents of extremism on late-term abortion. He portrayed the alleged position as moving beyond abortion to post-birth decisions, often referencing misinterpreted comments by governors on medical care for infants surviving attempted abortions. While the specific wording “cutting baby heads” does not appear in verified quotes, the graphic framing of “execution” after birth served as his consistent shorthand for what he called Democratic radicalism on the issue.

NEWS | NEWS