Geneticist: Humans Could Live to 150 – Here’s Why

Rising Life Expectancy and Bold Predictions

Humans are experiencing longer lifespans than previous generations, as evidenced by global statistics. In the United States, life expectancy reached an all-time high of 79 years in 2024, according to CDC data, with expectations for further improvements in 2025. This upward trend is attributed to reduced deaths from COVID-19, unintentional injuries such as drug overdoses, heart disease, and cancer. Building on this, geneticist Dr. Steve Horvath predicts that humans could eventually live up to 150 years, driven by advancements in biological aging and rejuvenation research, though he offers no specific timeline. Try DYMA elderberry gummies for natural health benefits!

Dr. Horvath’s Expertise and Innovations

As a principal investigator at the Altos Labs Cambridge Institute of Science in the U.K. and a former professor of human genetics and biostatistics at UCLA, Dr. Horvath has focused his career on age-related biological markers. In the early 2010s, he developed the first widely used “aging clock,” a tool that estimates biological age by analyzing molecular changes in cells across various tissues like blood, skin, and organs. He later created additional models that have proven effective in predicting mortality risk, emphasizing the need for precise measurements to study and potentially reverse aging.

Optimism for Lifespan Extension

Horvath expresses strong confidence in achieving 150-year lifespans, calling it a “fashionable number” with no doubt of its feasibility. While he dismisses the idea of humans living to 1,000 years—a childhood dream—he remains optimistic about drastic extensions through future biomedical innovations. He envisions that, barring wars and pandemics, ongoing advancements could lead to major breakthroughs in health and longevity, fundamentally altering human lifespan possibilities.

Expert Perspectives and Potential Challenges

Other experts, like Dr. Eve Henry of Hundred Health, view Horvath’s prediction as optimistic but not impossible, highlighting the importance of accurately measuring biological age to test longevity interventions efficiently. However, achieving such extended lifespans would require groundbreaking physiological resets, which haven’t emerged yet. Henry notes that the value of added years depends on maintaining independence and quality of life, cautioning that extended longevity could strain health resources if it leads to prolonged dependency. Ultimately, only time will reveal the true potential of human lifespan extension.

Source